Thompson v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
| James Ray Thompson |
| Warden, FCI Texarkana |
| 5:2026cv00060 |
| April 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| James Boone Baxter |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER to Show Cause: Respondent shall have 60 days from the date of service of process to answer petition. Clerk note - order to show cause, petition, and any supporting document thereto is served on Respondent automatically via NEF email of this entry to the USAO designee for a 2241 case. Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 6/15/2026. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas-Thompson) (slo)
|
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #6 Order mailed to Thompson at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Regular. (slo) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 2832R34M (psm) |
| Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt by James Ray Thompson on 5/20/2026 as to #3 Order and IFP form. (slo) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Warden, FCI Texarkana filed by James Ray Thompson. Related document(s): #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James Ray Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(slo) |
Filing 3
ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of this order in which to either: (1) pay the statutory $5.00 filing fee, or (2) furnish an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis which is accompanied by a properly certified in forma pauperis data sheet or inmate account record. Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 5/18/2026. (slo)
|
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #3 Order and IFP form mailed to Thompson at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Inmate ack. req. (slo) |
| Filing 2 Case: Thompson v. Warden, FCI Texarkana was filed on 4/27/202 and assigned to Judge Schroeder and referred to Judge Baxter. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Pro Se Instructions are sent to Pro Se.) (slo) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (fee not paid) filed by James Ray Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(slo) |
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Docket Sheet and Prisoner Pro Se Instructions mailed to Thompson at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Regular. (slo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thompson v. Warden, FCI Texarkana | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Ray Thompson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, FCI Texarkana | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.