Nunley v. Johnston et al
| Keith Edward Nunley |
| FNU Johnston, FNU Buffington, FNU Gardner and Medical Department |
| 5:2026cv00074 |
| June 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| James Boone Baxter |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #10 Order mailed to Nunley at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Regular. (slo) |
| Filing 11 Summons issued as to FNU Buffington, FNU Gardner, FNU Johnston (delivered to USM for service) (Attachments: #1 Summons-Gardner, #2 Summons-Buffington)(slo) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Keith Edward Nunley. It is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue process for FCI Texarkana WardenJohnston, FCI Texarkana (SIS) Buffington, and FCI Texarkana Dr. Gardner and deliver Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 8) to the United States Marshal for service at no cost to Plaintiff, and Defendants shall have sixty (60) days from the date of service of process to answer or otherwise plead. (Motion(s) #2 terminated). Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 7/24/2026. (slo)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to #5 Order filed by Keith Edward Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slo) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against FNU Buffington, FNU Gardner, FNU Johnston, Medical Department (Red Headed Nurse) filed by Keith Edward Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(slo) |
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #5 Order, #6 Order and 1983 complaint form mailed to Nunley at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Inmate ack. req. (slo) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of this order in which present a short and plain statement setting forth the Plaintiff's claims, on a standard 1983 lawsuit form. Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 6/24/2026. (slo)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of this order in which to either: (1) pay the statutory $405.00 filing fee or (2) furnish a properly certified in forma pauperis data sheet or inmate account summary sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 6/24/2026. (slo)
|
| Filing 4 Case: Nunley v. Johnston, et al was filed on 6/4/2026 and assigned to Judge Schroeder and referred to Judge Baxter. (slo) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER re #1 Complaint filed by Keith Edward Nunley. ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is TRANSFERRED forthwith to the Texarkana Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 6/4/2026. (gsm)
|
| Case transferred in from Tyler Division on 06/04/2026 ( Case Number 6:26-cv-253.). (slo) |
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Docket sheet, Pro Se Filer Instructions and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed mailed to Nunley at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Regular. (slo) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith Edward Nunley. (jbe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (fee not paid), filed by Keith Edward Nunley.(jbe) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2026: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (gsm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
