Witcher v. Perez et al
| Clarence Lodell Witcher |
| FNU Perez, FNU Bailey and FNU Pritchett |
| 5:2026cv00076 |
| June 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| James Boone Baxter |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Case: Witcher v. Perez, et al was filed on 6/10/2026 and assigned to Judge Schroeder and referred to Judge Baxter. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Pro Se Instructions, Invitation to a Non-Prisoner Pro Se to E-Filing/Consent to Electronic Notice, and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (slo) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clarence Lodell Witcher. (slo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Bailey, FNU Perez, FNU Pritchett (fee not paid) filed by Clarence Lodell Witcher. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(slo) |
| Clerk's Notice - Pro Se Instructions, Invitation to a Non-Prisoner Pro Se to E-Filing/Consent to Electronic Notice, and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge provided to Witcher at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. (slo) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and referred to Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter. (slo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
