Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Great Clips, Inc.
| Fall Line Patents, LLC |
| Great Clips, Inc. |
| 5:2026cv00081 |
| June 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Great Clips, Inc. answer is now due 9/11/2026. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(slo) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Great Clips, Inc.. Summons originally served on 07/09/2026. Agreed new answer date is 09/11/2026.(McNabnay, Neil) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rehan Mohammed Safiullah on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Safiullah, Rehan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Zachariah Harrington on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Harrington, Zachariah) |
| Filing 8 Summons returned executed by Fall Line Patents, LLC. Great Clips, Inc. served on 7/9/2026. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Larry Dean Thompson, Jr on behalf of Fall Line Patents, LLC (Thompson, Larry) |
| Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Great Clips, Inc.. (psm) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons for Great Clips, Inc. filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Cases by Fall Line Patents, LLC (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Great Clips, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11634786.), filed by Fall Line Patents, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Antonelli, Matthew) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (psm) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Fall Line Patents, LLC. (psm) |
| Case: Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Great Clips, Inc. was filed on 6/30/2026 and assigned to Judge Schroeder. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (psm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Great Clips, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fall Line Patents, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Matthew J Antonelli |
| Represented By: | Zachariah Harrington |
| Represented By: | Rehan Mohammed Safiullah |
| Represented By: | Larry Dean Thompson, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Great Clips, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Neil J McNabnay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.