Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC v. Hisense Company Ltd. et al
| Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC |
| Hisense Company Ltd., Hisense Visual Technology Co. Ltd., Hisense Laser Display Co., Ltd., Hisense International Co. Ltd., Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investments Co. Ltd., Hisense International (HK) Co. Ltd. and Hisense Electronica Mexico S.A. de C.V. |
| 5:2026cv00105 |
| July 31, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons issued as to Hisense Company Ltd., Hisense Electronica Mexico S.A. de C.V., Hisense International (HK) Co. Ltd., Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investments Co. Ltd., Hisense International Co. Ltd., Hisense Laser Display Co., Ltd., Hisense Visual Technology Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Summons-Hisense Electronica Mexico S.A. de C.V., #2 Summons-Hisense International Co., Ltd., #3 Summons-Hisense International (HK) Co., Ltd., #4 Summons-Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investments Co. Ltd., #5 Summons-Hisense Laser Display Co., Ltd., #6 Summons-Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd.)(slo) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC (DeRieux, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Daniel P. Hipskind on behalf of Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC (Hipskind, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hipskind, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (Hipskind, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC (Hipskind, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Cases by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC (Hipskind, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Hisense Company Ltd., Hisense Electronica Mexico S.A. de C.V., Hisense International (HK) Co. Ltd., Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investments Co. Ltd., Hisense International Co. Ltd., Hisense Laser Display Co., Ltd., Hisense Visual Technology Co. Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11703715.), filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - '570 Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - '213 Patent, #3 Exhibit 3 - '832 Patent, #4 Exhibit 4 - '343 Patent, #5 Exhibit 5 - '870 Patent, #6 Exhibit 6 - '765 Patent, #7 Exhibit 7 - '401 Patent, #8 Exhibit 8 - '096 Patent, #9 Exhibit 9 - '577 Patent, #10 Exhibit 10 - '573 Patent, #11 Exhibit 11 - '648 Patent, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Civil Cover Sheet) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Hipskind, Daniel) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo) |
| Case: Velocity Communication Technologies LLC v. Hisense Company, Ltd., et al was filed on 7/31/2026 and assigned to Judge Schroeder. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is attached. (slo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
