Scientific-Atlanta, Inc et al v. Forgent Networks, Inc.
Scientific-Atlanta, Inc and Motorola, Inc |
Forgent Networks, Inc. |
6:2005cv00343 |
September 19, 2005 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Tyler Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Leonard Davis |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Transfer and Consolidate Cases. New case number for 6:05cv343 is 2:05cv512, to be consolidated with 2:05cv318. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 11/8/05. (fnt, ) Modified on 11/9/2005 (fnt, ). Modified on 11/9/2005 (fnt, ). |
Intradistrict Transfer to Marshall Division., new case #2:05cv512. (fnt, ) |
Filing 15 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Leonard Davis : Motion Hearing held on 11/8/2005 re 7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Motion To Transfer filed by Forgent Networks, Inc.,, Scheduling Conference held on 11/8/2005. (Court Reporter Shea Sloan.) (rlf, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/8/2005 (rlf, ). |
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re 7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Motion To Transfer filed by Forgent Networks, Inc.. (Luck, Gregory) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Wayne Manford Harding on behalf of Motorola, Inc (Harding, Wayne) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re 7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Motion To Transfer filed by Motorola, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Brian Erickson)(Jones, Michael) |
Filing 11 Forgent Networks, Inc. ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Forgent Networks, Inc..(Luck, Gregory) |
Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Brian K. Erickson; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-1-2696 (fnt, ) |
Filing 10 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Brian K Erickson for Motorola, Inc. Approved by F. Thompson(fnt, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Motion To Transfer, along with 51 Motion to Coordinate Pretrial Proceedings in Case No. 2:05-cv-318: Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2005 09:30 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. cc: Parties(rlf, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER/NOTICE of Scheduling Conference set for 11/8/2005 09:30 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/17/05. (fnt, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Motion To Transfer by Forgent Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order granting Forgent Networks, Inc. motion to transfer/consolidate)(Luck, Gregory) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney George D Medlock, Jr for Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Approved 10/5/05(fnt, ) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Angela Payne James for Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Approved 10/5/05(fnt, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Patrick J Flinn for Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Approved 10/5/05(fnt, ) |
Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Flinn, James, Medlock, Jr; Fee: $25 each, totaling $75.00, receipt number: 6-1-2539 (fnt, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge William M. Steger recused. Case reassigned to Judge Leonard Davis for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge William M. Steger on 9/22/05. (fnt, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT cc:pltfs 9-21-05 (mll, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Forgent Networks, Inc. , filed by Scientific-Atlanta, Inc, Motorola, Inc. (Attachments: (1) Civil Cover Sheet)(mll, ) |
Filing fee: $ 250.00, receipt number 6-2355 (mll, ) |
Summons Issued as to Forgent Networks, Inc.. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.