Shuffield v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Chris Wayne Shuffield
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 6:2008cv00180
Filed: May 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office
County: Bowie
Presiding Judge: Leonard Davis
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254ex Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Capital)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice as moot. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 06/18/14. (mll, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shuffield v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chris Wayne Shuffield
Represented By: Jeff Lynn Haas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?