Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Pozen Inc.
Defendant:	Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Case Number:	6:2008cv00437
Filed:	November 14, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Patent Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Leonard Davis
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	35:271 Patent Infringement

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 5, 2011	Filing 416 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 08/05/11. cc:attys 8-05-11(mll, )
June 18, 2010	Filing 257 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER setting forth the Court's constructions for the disputed claim terms in the patents asserted by Plaintiff Pozen Inc. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to this Memorandum Opinion and Order as an Appendix. The construction set forth for the disputed term "concomitant administration" was clarified in Section II. Finding that the additional language was supported by the intrinsic record, Defendants' Motion to Clarify the Provisional ClaimConstruction Order 204 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 6/18/10. (mjc, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 5, 2011

Filing 416 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 08/05/11. cc:attys 8-05-11(mll, )

June 18, 2010

Filing 257 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER setting forth the Court's constructions for the disputed claim terms in the patents asserted by Plaintiff Pozen Inc. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to this Memorandum Opinion and Order as an Appendix. The construction set forth for the disputed term "concomitant administration" was clarified in Section II. Finding that the additional language was supported by the intrinsic record, Defendants' Motion to Clarify the Provisional ClaimConstruction Order 204 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 6/18/10. (mjc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pozen Inc.
Represented By:	Collin Michael Maloney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?