Pate v. Wheat et al
| Cheyenne Pate |
| Kevin R. Wheat, Guillermo Delarosa, Donald C Dean, Jr, Michael B Crow, Stacey K. Crawley and Bodiel G Mares |
| 6:2009cv00259 |
| June 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| Leonard Davis |
| John D. Love |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER ADOPTING 73 Report & Recommendations; denying 56 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Cheyenne Pate; granting 57 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Jeffery P Brainard, Donald C Dean, Jr, Guillermo Delarosa, Bodiel G Mares, Stephen D Farquahr, Kevin R. Wheat, Michael B Crow, Stacey K. Crawley. The Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 05/24/10. cc:pltf & dfts 5-24-10(mll, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING 29 Report and Recommendations. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for purposes of IFP proceedings. Pltf's IFP status is REVOKED. The pltf may proceed with the lawsuit if he pays the remainder of the entire filing fee of $350.00 within 30 days from the entry of this Order. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 11/30/09. cc:attys 11-30-09(mll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
