Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation |
| Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless |
| 6:2010cv00066 |
| February 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Smith |
| Leonard Davis |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth L DeRieux |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
