Vasquez v. Childress et al
| Cresencio J Vasquez, Jr |
| J Childress, Ricky L Smith, Steven E Wingate, Michael W Owens, Robert L Hazzelwood, James B Culpepper and Paula A Byrd |
| 6:2011cv00086 |
| February 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Smith |
| Judith K. Guthrie |
| Michael H. Schneider |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Order granting Defendants' 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all Defendants except for Smith and Childress. The claims against Smith and Childress are di smissed with prejudice until such time as the Plaintiff can show that the disciplinary case he received has been overturned, expunged, or set aside. The Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Hazelwood, Culpepper, and Wingate are DISMISSED with prejuidce as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. All motions pending in this action are DENIED. It is further ordered that the dismissal of these claims as frivolous shall count as a strike for purposes of 28 USC 1915(g) and a copy of this order will be provided to the Administrator of the Three Strikes List for the EDTX. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 6/25/2012. (leh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
