Canales v. Robertson et al
| Ramiro Canales |
| Stephen R Robertson and Benjamin M Hock, Jr |
| 6:2011cv00190 |
| April 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| Judith K. Guthrie |
| Michael H. Schneider |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order on Plaintiff's 52 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment or to Amend the Complaint. It is ordered that the Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment or Amend the Complaint is denied. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 5/31/2012. (leh, ) (Main Document 53 replaced on 5/31/2012) (leh, ).
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This civil case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b); E.D. Tex. L.R. 41. Any motions pending in this action are DENIED. Order adopting 42 Report and Recommendations of the US Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 5/2/12. (leh, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying Defendants' 31 Motion for Summary Judgment due to the existence of genuine disputes of material fact. Order adopting 40 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 4/20/2012. (leh, )
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, AND ORDER DENYING 6 MOTION for Recusal filed by Ramiro Canales. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 5/13/2011. (gsg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
