L.C. Eldridge Sales Co., Ltd. et al v. Azen Manufacturing Pte., Ltd. et al
| L.C. Eldridge Sales Co., Ltd. and Leseman Davis LLC |
| Azen Manufacturing Pte., Ltd., Jurong Shipyard Pte. Ltd., Sembcorp Marine Ltd., Twin City Fan Companies, Ltd., Zhengzhou FG Offshore Engineering & Equipment Co., Ltd., Atwood Drilling, Inc., Atwood Oceanics Management, LP, Friede Goldman Offshore, Inc., FG Engineering, Ltd., Seadrill Americas, Inc., Sembcorp Holdings, LLC, Sembcorp-Sabine Industries, Inc. and Sembcorp-Sabine Shipyard, Inc. |
| 6:2011cv00599 |
| November 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Smith |
| Michael H. Schneider |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 113 MOTION for Summary Judgment OF INDEFINITENESS AS TO CLAIMS 1, 3, 17, 29, 39, 43, AND 51 AND RELATED DEPENDENT CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,707,828 filed by Sembcorp Holdings, LLC, Twin City Fan Compan ies, Ltd., Friede & Goldman, L.L.C., Sembcorp-Sabine Industries, Inc., Sembcorp Marine Ltd., Jurong Shipyard Pte. Ltd., Azen Manufacturing Pte., Ltd., Seadrill Americas, Inc., Sembcorp-Sabine Shipyard, Inc., Atwood Oceanics Management, LP, Atwood Drilling, Inc. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 5/23/13. (mjc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
