Beasley v. Ivy et al
| Paul Beasley |
| Michael Lamb, John Moore, Richard A Morris, Gary Wright, Virginia Schafer, David Fortner, Clayton Harold, Sandra Reed, Larry Ivy, Donna Kazmierczak, Vernon L Allen and Kimberly Plentl |
| 6:2012cv00450 |
| July 13, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| John D. Love |
| Michael H. Schneider |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER DISMISSING CASE AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 42 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Kazmierczak, Allen and Moore are dismissed. This case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. All motions not previously ruled on are denied. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 10/29/13. (mjc, )
|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff may proceed with his claims for denial of due process during a disciplinary hearing against Defendant Kazmierczak and for failure to protect against Defendants Allen and Moore. Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendants Ivy, Plentl, Lamb, Morris, Wright, Schafer, Fortner, Harold and Reed are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 11/15/12. cc:pltf 11-15-12(mll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.