Ward v. Davis et al
| Lewis Ward |
| Jessica S Boger, Erma J Davis, Jason Gould and Regina R Oliver |
| 6:2012cv00834 |
| October 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| Leonard Davis |
| Judith K. Guthrie |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff Lewis Ward's IFP status is hereby REVOKED. This civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the refiling of another IFP lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but without prejudice to the refiling of this lawsuit without seeking IFP status and upon payment of the statutory $350.00 filing fee. Should Ward refile his lawsuit upon payment of the full filing fee, he must also show proof that he has satisf ied the sanctions imposed by the WesternDistrict of Texas, and he must obtain written permission from a district judge or magistrate judge of the Eastern District of Texas. Should Plaintiff pay the full filing fee within 15 days after the date of ent ry of final judgment in this case, and show proof of the satisfaction of the sanctions, he shall beallowed to proceed in the lawsuit as through the full fee had been paid from the outset. Any and all motions which may be pending in this action are herebyDENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 04/18/13. (mll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
