Mack v. Bell et al
| Craig Mack |
| James Zeller, Michael . Bell, Davida Chapman, Dick R Tracy, E Walt, Brenda Thomson, Neita Beckworth, Franklin Hudson, L Anderson, Michael Driggs, Cassandra Kalnins and B Hardy |
| 6:2012cv00852 |
| November 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Rusk |
| Leonard Davis |
| John D. Love |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed IFP 2 is DENIED. This civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the refiling of another IFP lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but wi thout prejudice to the refiling of this lawsuit without seeking IFP status and upon payment of the statutory $350.00 filing fee. Should the Plaintiff pay the full filing fee within 15 days after the date ofentry of final judgment in this case, h e shall be allowed to proceed in the lawsuit as through the full fee had been paid from the outset. It should be noted that payment of the filing fee will not affect a frivolousness analysis. Any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 02/19/13. cc:pltf 2-19-13(mll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
