Norman IP Holdings, LLC v. ADTRAN, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Norman IP Holdings, LLC v. ADTRAN, Inc.

Norman IP Holdings, LLC v. ADTRAN, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Norman IP Holdings, LLC
Defendant:	ADTRAN, Inc.
Case Number:	6:2013cv00392
Filed:	May 13, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Tyler Office
County:	Smith
Presiding Judge:	Leonard Davis
Presiding Judge:	John D. Love
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 8, 2014	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. This action is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED until the PTO has issued its final decisions on the inter partes review of claim 6 of the '597 Patent. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a status report within te n days of issuance of the IPR decision of claim 6 of the '597 Patent. The parties may either file an agreed upon status report or individual motions which inform the court of the ruling of the IPR and how the parties would like to proceed with the case. The Court ORDERS that ADTRAN is estopped from asserting invalidity contentions raised and adjudicated in the Nissan IPR proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 10/08/14. (mll, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 8, 2014

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. This action is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED until the PTO has issued its final decisions on the inter partes review of claim 6 of the '597 Patent. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a status report within te n days of issuance of the IPR decision of claim 6 of the '597 Patent. The parties may either file an agreed upon status report or individual motions which inform the court of the ruling of the IPR and how the parties would like to proceed with the case. The Court ORDERS that ADTRAN is estopped from asserting invalidity contentions raised and adjudicated in the Nissan IPR proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 10/08/14. (mll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norman IP Holdings, LLC v. ADTRAN, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norman IP Holdings, LLC
Represented By:	Andrew Gerald DiNovo
Represented By:	Adam G Price
Represented By:	Chester Jianbon Shiu
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ADTRAN, Inc.
Represented By:	Paul Peter Bolus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?