Contractors Cargo Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate of Insurance No. M3100425
Plaintiff: Contractors Cargo Company
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate of Insurance No. M3100425
Case Number: 6:2013cv00406
Filed: May 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Tyler Office
County: Cherokee
Presiding Judge: Leonard Davis
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contractors Cargo Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate of Insurance No. M3100425
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Contractors Cargo Company
Represented By: Ronald L Bair
Represented By: William James Cozort, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Certificate of Insurance No. M3100425
Represented By: Michelle Press
Represented By: James Price Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?