McCoy v. Murray et al
| James Bell McCoy |
| Lanette Linthicum, Owen Murray and Pam Pace |
| 6:2014cv00228 |
| March 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| K. Nicole Mitchell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's objections are overruled and the Report of the Magistrate Judge 10 is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed IFP 3 is hereby DENI ED. This civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the refiling of another IFP lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but without prejudice to the refiling of this lawsuit without seeking IFP status andupon payment of the full fili ng fee. Should Plaintiff pay the full filing fee within 15 days after the date of entry of final judgment in this case, he shall be allowed to proceed in the lawsuit as through the full fee had been paid from the outset. Any and all motions which may be pending in this action are herebyDENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 05/19/14. (mll, )
|
|
Filing
8
OPINION AND ORDER OF TRANSFER to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 3/27/2014.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
