Johnson v. Couch et al
Chester R Johnson |
Kenneth R Burkley, Jr, Felicia A Rickard, Jeremy C Mayfield, Mark L Walker, Mason K Couch and Carri Cantrell |
6:2014cv00518 |
May 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Tyler Office |
Tyler |
K. Nicole Mitchell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's objections are overruled and the Report of the Magistrate Judge 4 is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 i s DENIED. The above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the refiling of another IFP lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but without prejudice to the refiling of this lawsuit without seeking IFP status and upon payme nt of the statutory $400.00 filing fee. Should Plaintiff pay the full filing fee within 15 days after the date of entry of final judgment in this case, he shall be allowed to proceed in the lawsuit as through the full fee had been paid from the outset. A copy of this Memorandum Opinion shall be provided by the Clerk to the Administrator of the Strikes List for the Eastern District of Texas. Any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 09/04/14. (mll, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.