Payne v. Stephen et al
| Richard Payne |
| William Stephen, Joel F Barbosa and Peggy J Rozell |
| 6:2014cv00519 |
| May 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| Leonard Davis |
| K. Nicole Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation 123 is ADOPTED. Defendants McArthur, Raymond and Rozell's motion for summaryjudgment 101 is GRANTED. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 12/02/15. (mll, )
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER DENYING 94 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Richard Payne, and ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 98 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 8/31/2015. (gsg)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceedings. Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP 3 is DENIED. Payne may resume the lawsuit if he pays the entire filing fee of $400 within 30 days from the entry of this Order of Dismissal and Final Judgment. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 07/07/14. (mll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
