Miller v. University of Texas Medical BRanch et al
| Robert Miller |
| University of Texas Medical BRanch, Rick Thaler, Yesenia Beltran, Wayne Brecoer, Eldon Monk, Chris Divin, Maricela Rendon, Paul Shrode, Virginia Shafer, Charlotte Bussey, Robert Criss, Jerry Franklin, Edgar Baker and Christopher Holman |
| 6:2015cv00382 |
| April 7, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| John D. Love |
| Michael H. Schneider |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's objections are overruled and the Report of the Magistrate Judge 13 is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pa uperis 2 is DENIED. The above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the refiling of another IFP lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but without prejudice to the refiling of this lawsuit without seeking IFP status an d upon payment of the statutory $400.00 filing fee. Should the Plaintiff pay the full filing fee within 15 days after the date of entry of final judgment in this case, he shall be allowed to proceed in the lawsuit as through the full fee had been paid from the outset. Any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 10/21/15. (mll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
