Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. ADTRAN, Inc.
| Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC |
| ADTRAN, Inc. |
| 6:2015cv00618 |
| July 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| John D. Love |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
814
ORDER denying 788 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on January 13, 2017. (jml)
|
|
Filing
498
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER DENYING 457 MOTION to Stay -Dell's and Aerohive's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Reviews filed by Dell Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 7/29/2016. (gsg)
|
|
Filing
454
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions as set forth in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 06/17/16. (mll, )
|
|
Filing
246
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER transferring Consolidated Civil Action 6:15cv634 to the Northern District of California. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 01/15/16. (mll, )
|
|
Filing
231
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER transferring Consolidated Civil Action 6:15cv630 to the Northern District of California. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 01/11/16. (mll, )
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 59 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/10/2015. (gsg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
