Ayala v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
Jesus Ayala |
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and Brad Livingston |
6:2016cv00612 |
June 13, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Tyler Office |
Anderson |
Ron Clark |
K. Nicole Mitchell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's objections are overruled and the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 9) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. The above-styl ed civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 09/14/17. (mll, ) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendation. Ordered that civil action 6:16cv612, and civil action 6:16cv1144, are hereby consolidated for all purposes into one civil lawsuit, styled as Ayala v TDCJ, et al, civil action 6:16cv612. Order 3ed that a separate filing fee shall not be charged for cause no 6;16cv1144. Ordered that the motion for appointment of cnsl and for leave to proceed IFP in cause no 6:16cv1144 are denied as moot and unnecessary.. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 1/25/2017. (bjc, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.