Fisher-Dey v. Moore
Petitioner: Ardie Dean Fisher-Dey
Respondent: Dan Moore
Case Number: 6:2016cv01191
Filed: August 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Tyler Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: John D. Love
Presiding Judge: Robert W. Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendation. Ordered that Petitioner's 1 Motion for Writ of Mandamus is denied. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 1/19/2017. (bjc, )
September 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 9/27/16. (tkd, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fisher-Dey v. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ardie Dean Fisher-Dey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dan Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?