REALTIME DATA LLC d/b/a IXO, v. Echostar Corporation, et al
| REALTIME DATA LLC d/b/a IXO, |
| EchoStar Corporation and Hughes Network Systems, LLC |
| EchoStar Corporation and Hughes Network Systems LLC |
| 6:2017cv00084 |
| February 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| John D. Love |
| Robert W. Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
300
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 174 MOTION to Strike Portions of the Jagadish August 3, 2018 Non-infringement Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 11/29/2018. (saenz, )
|
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 04/25/18. (mll, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 42 Report and Recommendations, and granting-in-part and denying-in-part 28 Motion to Dismiss filed by Hughes Network Systems, LLC, EchoStar Corporation. Specifically, the Court DENIES EchoStar/ Hughes's Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue and GRANTS EchoStar/Hughes's Request for partial dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6). Realtime's claims of willful infringement and pre-suit indirect infringement are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 8/21/17. (mjc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
