Earle v. Atkinson et al
| Brian Clay Earle |
| Kevin Atkinson, Sam Threadgill, James Hildebrand, Jim Wheeler, Jim Brown, Juan Ramirez, Tom Miller, Missy Britton Birchfield, Does 1-50, Tom Castloo, Wood County, Tim Koonce and City of Alba |
| 6:2017cv00281 |
| May 9, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Wood |
| K. Nicole Mitchell |
| Robert W. Schroeder |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants City of Alba Police Officers Juan Ramirez, Tom Miller, and Tim Koonce's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 65 ) and Defendants Kevin Atkinson, Sam Threadgill, James Hildebrand, Tom Castloo, Jim Brown, and Jim Wheeler's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 66 ) are GRANTED. Accordingly, the claims against Juan Ramirez, Tom Miller, Tim Koonce, the City of Alba, Kevin Atkinson, Sam Threadgill, James Hildebrand, Tom Castloo, Jim Brown, and Jim Wheeler are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have ten days to show cause why the remaining claim against Wood County, Texas, should not be dismissed as a result of the finding that no Wood County law enforcement officer inflicted a constitutional harm. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/11/2018. (rlf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
