Cook v. City of Tyler, Texas et al
| Kerry Max Cook |
| City of Tyler, Texas, Smith County, Texas, Eddie Clark, Eric Liptak, Douglas Collard, Robert Bond, Gerald Hayden, Nelson Downing, Fred Mayo, Kenneth Findley, Ronald Scott, Ronnie Malloch, Marvin T. McLeroy, Stuart Dowell, Robert Wickham, Jake Massey, J.B. Smith, Gene Carlson, Jimmy Toler, Larry Smith, Unknown Tyler Police Officers and Unknown Smith County Sheriff's Deputies |
| 6:2017cv00333 |
| June 5, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Smith |
| Robert W. Schroeder |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 135 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. 122) filed by Smith County, Texas, J.B. Smith, DENYING 138 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(6) filed by Marvin T. McLeroy, DENY ING 143 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief filed by City of Tyler, Texas, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 146 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Stay filed by Kenneth Findley, Robert Bond, Nelson Downing, Gerald Hayden, Eddie Clar k, Eric Liptak, Ronald Scott, and GRANTING 167 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Fred Mayo. Kenneth Findley, Fred Mayo, Ronald Scott, J.B. Smith, Robert Bond and Nelson Downing are terminated from the case. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 8/21/2025. (esw)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court GRANTS-IN-PART Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 60 and 63 ) on the basis of governmental immunity from state-law tort claims as to all Defendants and on the basis of absolut e immunity as to Defendant Robert Wickham. Defendants' motions are DENIED-IN-PART on all other grounds. In light of the Court's rulings contained herein, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer and file a joint status repo rt within twenty (20) days from the date of this order as to how the parties believe the case should proceed. The parties' pending motions regarding proposed docket control orders (Docket Nos. 48 and 49 ) are DENIED-AS-MOOT, and the Court will instruct the parties to re-submit a proposed docket control order at a later time. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/18/2018. (rlf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
