Barnes v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Barnes v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company

Barnes v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Steve R. Barnes
Defendant:	Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number:	6:2017cv00586
Filed:	October 16, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Tyler Office
County:	Smith
Presiding Judge:	K. Nicole Mitchell
Presiding Judge:	Robert W. Schroeder
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	12 U.S.C. § 635
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 14, 2021	Filing 59 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Magistrate Judge's Report 56 is ADOPTED and Defendant Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, for Judgment under Rule 52 47 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Judgment 52 is DENIED. Defendant's denial of benefits is AFFIRMED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 03/14/21. (mll, )
July 6, 2020	Filing 40 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation 37 is ADOPTED. Provident's Motion Regarding the Applicability of ERISA 25 , construed as a motion for partial summary judgment, is GRANTED. The disability insurance policies at issue in this case are ERISA employee benefit plans and Barnes's state law claims are PREEMPTED by ERISA. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 07/06/20. (mll, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 14, 2021

Filing 59 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Magistrate Judge's Report 56 is ADOPTED and Defendant Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, for Judgment under Rule 52 47 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Judgment 52 is DENIED. Defendant's denial of benefits is AFFIRMED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 03/14/21. (mll, )

July 6, 2020

Filing 40 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation 37 is ADOPTED. Provident's Motion Regarding the Applicability of ERISA 25 , construed as a motion for partial summary judgment, is GRANTED. The disability insurance policies at issue in this case are ERISA employee benefit plans and Barnes's state law claims are PREEMPTED by ERISA. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 07/06/20. (mll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnes v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve R. Barnes
Represented By:	J Bennett White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Represented By:	Dennis M Lynch
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?