Mark v. Spears et al
| Michael L. Mark |
| Lee Ann Spears, Kevin R. Wheat, Balden O Polk, Vickie Barrow, Jonathan Clark, Gina Bentley, Jennifer Smith, Billy Horton, Lanette Linthicum, LeAnn Irons-Rodriguez and Michael Greer |
| 6:2018cv00309 |
| June 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| Thad Heartfield |
| K. Nicole Mitchell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 95 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that Defendants motion for summary judgment limited to exhaustion, (Dkt.#74), is DENIED and the remaining claims in Plaintiffs civil rights lawsuit are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 2/7/2022. (gsg)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL adopting 38 Report and Recommendation insofar as it recommends dismissal of pltf's time-barred claims. Defts' 17 , 20 and 23 Motions to Dismiss are granted to the limited extent that pltf's 2014, 20 15, and 2016 claims are dismissed, with prejudice, because they are time-barred. Pltf's 2017 and 2018 claims will proceed before the court. Ordered that any claim for monetary damages against defts in their official capacities is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 8/22/19. (tkd, ) Modified on 8/23/2019 (tkd, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
