Smith v. USA
Petitioner: Steven Michael Smith
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 6:2018cv00404
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Thad Heartfield
Referring Judge: John D Love
2 Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-43897. (mjc, )
September 14, 2018 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Steven Michael Smith on 9/10/2018 as to #7 Order. (mjc, )
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Thad Heartfield for all further proceedings. District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/10/2018. (mjc, )
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of this order in which to either: (1) pay the statutory $5.00 filing fee, or (2) furnish an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis which is accompanied by a properly certified in forma pauperis data sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 9/4/2018. (saenz, )
August 27, 2018 Filing 6 Letter to Court re Sentence from Steven M Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rlf)
August 13, 2018 Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (rlf)
August 13, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT. (rlf)
August 13, 2018 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Consent form mailed to Petitioner. (rlf)
August 13, 2018 Case transferred in from Sherman Division on 08/13/2018 Case Number 4:18-cv-571. (rlf)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 TRANSFER ORDER. ORDERED Petitioner's case is TRANSFERRED to the Tyler Division of the Eastern District of Texas. 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 8/10/2018. (kls, )
August 6, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Steven Michael Smith. (Fee Not Paid) (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(kls, )
August 6, 2018 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (kls, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Stevan Adam Buys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Michael Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?