Kamel v. Avenu Insights & Analytics LLC et al
Ted Kamel |
Avenu Insights & Analytics LLC and Chris Yeary |
6:2018cv00422 |
August 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Tyler Office |
Smith |
K Nicole Mitchell |
Robert W Schroeder |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Brief in Support filed by Ted Kamel. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Kamel's Motion for Remand)(Pevsner, Joseph) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant Chris Yeary's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Brief in Support) (Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Chris Yeary's Motion to Dismiss) filed by Avenu Insights & Analytics LLC. (Royal, Michael) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Brief in Support filed by Avenu Insights & Analytics LLC, Chris Yeary. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Letter of June 20, 2018, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Flores, Mark) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant Chris Yeary's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Brief in Support) filed by Ted Kamel. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pevsner, Joseph) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Brief in Support by Ted Kamel. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pevsner, Joseph) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/20/2018: #2 Revised Proposed Order) (rlf, ). |
NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the #6 Motion to Remand submitted by Ted Kamel. Document does not contain a Certificate of Conference. Correction should be made by within one business day. (rlf) |
Filing 6 ***FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE DISREGARD.*** MOTION to Remand to State Court and Brief in Support by Ted Kamel. (Pevsner, Joseph) Modified on 9/17/2018 (rlf). |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant Chris Yeary's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Brief in Support) by Chris Yeary. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Flores, Mark) |
Filing 4 Defendant's Original ANSWER to #2 Complaint and, COUNTERCLAIM against Ted Kamel by Avenu Insights & Analytics LLC.(Flores, Mark) |
Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. (rlf) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rlf) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ted Kamel. (rlf) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT (PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AS FILED IN STATE COURT ACTION) against Avenu Insights & Analytics LLC, Chris Yeary, filed by Ted Kamel.(rlf) |
District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell added. (rlf) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Chris Yeary, Avenu Insights & Analytics LLC from Smith County District Court, case number 18-1602-A. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6903068), filed by Chris Yeary, Avenu Insights & Analytics LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit B - Email of CSC, dated 8/16/2018, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Royal, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.