Hicks v. Biggs et al
| Dude Hicks and Larry Coleman Hicks |
| David Biggs and Matt Bingham |
| 6:2018cv00438 |
| August 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Richard A Schell |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to #10 Order, #9 Order, #11 Order, by Larry Coleman Hicks. (rlf) |
Filing 11
DEFICIENCY ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of this order in which to either: (1) pay the statutory $400.00 filing fee, which is the fee for persons not granted in forma pauperis status, or (2) furnish a properly certified in forma pauperis data sheet or inmate account summary sheet, which may be obtained from an authorized officer in the law library at the institution where he is confined. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/21/2018. (rlf)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO AMEND #1 Complaint. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of receipt of this order in which to file an amended complaint. Until this amended complaint is filed, no other motions other than one (1) request for extension of time to comply may be filed in this case. The Clerk shall return unfiled any motions which do not comply with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/21/2018. (rlf)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO CORRECT PLAINTIFF'S NAME. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall correct the style of the case on the docket sheet in the present case to reflect that the Plaintiff is "Larry Coleman Hicks" as opposed to "Dude Hicks." The Clerk of the Court is directed to address any orders or court correspondence to "Larry Coleman Hicks," rather than "Dude Hicks." It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall use his legal name on his pleadings and correspondence to the Court. The failure to comply with this order can result in the dismissal of this case for failure to obey an order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/21/2018. (rlf)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to be Heard by the Judge by Dude Hicks. (rlf) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Correct Defendant Biggs' Name by Dude Hicks. (rlf) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Richard A. Schell for all further proceedings. District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/4/2018. (gsg)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Jury Trial by Dude Hicks. (mll, ) |
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K NICOLE MITCHELL (mll, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dude Hicks. (mll, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Biggs, Matt Bingham, filed by Dude Hicks.(mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. MAILED Consent Form to Plaintiff. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
