MOBILE SYNERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC v. Sprint Corporation, et al
| MOBILE SYNERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC |
| Boost Mobile, LLC, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Sprint Corporation |
| 6:2018cv00445 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sprint Solutions, Inc. to 11/2/2018; Sprint Corporation to 11/2/2018; Boost Mobile, LLC to 11/2/2018; Sprint Spectrum L.P. to 11/2/2018. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(rlf) |
| Filing 8 Defendants' Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Boost Mobile, LLC, Sprint Corporation, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P. ( Weber, Robert) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sprint Solutions, Inc. to 10/18/2018; Sprint Corporation to 10/18/2018; Boost Mobile, LLC to 10/18/2018; Sprint Spectrum L.P. to 10/18/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mjc, ) |
| Filing 7 Defendants' Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Boost Mobile, LLC, Sprint Corporation, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P. ( Weber, Robert) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert William Weber on behalf of Boost Mobile, LLC, Sprint Corporation, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P. (Weber, Robert) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Boost Mobile, LLC, Sprint Corporation, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) Sprint Corporation, #2 Summons(es) Sprint Solutions, #3 Summons(es) Sprint Spectrum)(mll, ) |
| Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K NICOLE MITCHELL. (mll, ) |
| District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell added. (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by MOBILE SYNERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC. (mll, ) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by MOBILE SYNERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Monument Patent Holdings, LLC for MOBILE SYNERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC. (Connor, Cabrach) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Connor, Cabrach) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Sprint Corporation, Sprint Spectrum L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc., Boost Mobile, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6914432.), filed by MOBILE SYNERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 8,494,490, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 8,792,874, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Connor, Cabrach) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
