Mallory v. American United Life Insurance Company
| Mark Mallory |
| American United Life Insurance Company |
| 6:2018cv00458 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay Deadlines. It is therefore ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines is GRANTED and that all deadlines between Plaintiff and Defendant in the Docket Control Order are STAYED for thirty(30) days so that the parties may submit appropriate dismissal papers. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/11/2018. (rlf)
|
| Filing 5 Agreed SEALED MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement by American United Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Johnson, Blaire) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/9/2018: #2 Revised Text of Proposed Order) (rlf, ). |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for American United Life Insurance Company to 10/7/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(rlf) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re American United Life Insurance Company.( Johnson, Blaire) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT. (mll, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against American United Life Insurance Company, filed by Mark Mallory. (Filed as Original Petition in state court.)(mll, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by American United Life Insurance Company from Cherokee County, case number 2018-080574. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6924502), filed by American United Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Johnson, Blaire) |
| District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III added. (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mallory v. American United Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American United Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Blaire Bruns Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Mallory | |
| Represented By: | Clay Wilder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
