Rundell v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
Marian D Rundell |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, McKesson Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP |
6:2018cv00463 |
September 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Robert W Schroeder |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Interdistrict transfer to the Eastern District of Kentucky - MDL 2809. (rlf) |
Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER RE MDL NO. 2809. Signed by Jeffery N. Luithi, Clerk of the Panel on 10/10/2018. (rlf) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, McKesson Corporation, and emailed to Plaintiff for service. (Attachments: #1 SUMONS - AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, #2 SUMMONS - McKesson Corp)(rlf) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Marian D Rundell. (rlf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6926019.), filed by Marian D Rundell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons(es) Summons for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, #3 Summons(es) Summons for Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., #4 Summons(es) Summons for McKesson Corp.)(Copeland, Erin) |
District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III added. (rlf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.