Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff: Ronald Graig Smith
Defendant: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 6:2018cv00502
Filed: September 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John D Love
Referring Judge: Richard A Schell
2 Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Craig William Cosper on behalf of Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID (Cosper, Craig)
November 1, 2018 Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Ronald Graig Smith as to #11 Notice of Case Assignment, #9 Case Referred to Magistrate Judge, #10 Order - RECEIVED 10.2.2018. (rlf)
October 22, 2018 Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF SERVICE by Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID through the Attorney General for the State of Texas by Laura Haney on 10/22/2018. (rlf)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - HABEAS PETITION - STATE. Respondent to file response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Copy of order to Edward Marshall and Laura Haney via electronic noticing including petition and any supporting documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 10/12/2018. (rlf)
October 12, 2018 Filing fee received: $ 5, receipt number 6-44060 (gsg)
October 10, 2018 ***INCORRECT RECEIPT NUMBER. DISREGARD.*** Filing fee received: $ 5, receipt number 6-44015 (gsg) Modified on 10/12/2018 (gsg).
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASES. Case reassigned to District Judge Richard A. Schell for all further proceedings. District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/2/2018. (saenz, )
September 25, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT. (rlf) (rlf, ).
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO PAY FILING FEE. It is accordingly ORDERED that Petitioner has thirty days from the receipt of this order to pay the filing fee of $5. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 9/25/2018. (rlf)
September 25, 2018 Filing 9 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (rlf)
September 24, 2018 Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 3:18-cv-02477. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
September 24, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon Sep 24 09:36:27 CDT 2018 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Tyler Division of Eastern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 9/21/2018) (axm) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]
September 19, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Sep 19 09:38:48 CDT 2018 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]
September 17, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Ronald Graig Smith (ykp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]
September 17, 2018 Filing 5 Amendment Motion Attachments to the 2254 Applications Writ of Habeas Corpus re: #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ronald Graig Smith (ykp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]
September 17, 2018 Filing 4 Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Ronald Graig Smith re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ykp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]
September 17, 2018 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ronald Graig Smith. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ykp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]
September 17, 2018 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (ykp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]
September 17, 2018 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 9/24/2018.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Craig William Cosper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Graig Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?