Hicks v. Unknown Defendants
Plaintiff: Larry Coleman Hicks
Defendant: Uknown Defendants and Unknown Defendants
Case Number: 6:2018cv00506
Filed: September 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Thad Heartfield
Referring Judge: K Nicole Mitchell
2 Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE to the Court re Conspiracy by Larry Coleman Hicks. (rlf)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Thad Heartfield for all further proceedings. District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/15/2018. (gsg)
October 3, 2018 Filing 7 CORRESPONDENCE by Larry Coleman Hicks. (mjc, )
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Larry Coleman Hicks. ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of this order in which to either: (1) pay the statutory $400.00 filing fee, which is the fee for persons not granted in forma pauperis status, or (2) furnish a properly certified in forma pauperis data sheet or inmateaccount summary sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/26/2018. (gsg)
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to amended #1 Complaint filed by Larry Coleman Hicks. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/26/2018. (gsg)
September 25, 2018 Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. (efarris, )
September 25, 2018 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Consent form mailed to Plaintiff. (efarris, )
September 24, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry Coleman Hicks. (efarris, )
September 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Uknown Defendants, filed by Larry Coleman Hicks.(efarris, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Unknown Defendants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uknown Defendants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Defendants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Coleman Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?