Lucky Tunes #3 LLC v. Smith et al
Lucky Tunes #3 LLC |
Larry R Smith and Jason Railsback |
6:2018cv00563 |
October 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Jeremy D Kernodle |
Robert W Schroeder |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ANSWER to #12 Amended Complaint by Larry R Smith.(Brandt, Thomas) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint by Jason Railsback.(Brandt, Thomas) |
Filing 14 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 12/20/2018. (rlf) |
Filing 13 Case Reassgined to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III no longer assigned to the case. (rlf) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST) against All Defendants, filed by Lucky Tunes #3 LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-F to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint)(Baggish, Stuart) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Lucky Tunes #3 LLC (Van Cleef, L.) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Jason Railsback.(Brandt, Thomas) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Larry R Smith.(Brandt, Thomas) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Jason Railsback to 12/4/2018. 13 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(rlf) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Larry R Smith to 12/4/2018. 8 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(rlf) |
Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Jason Railsback.( Husted, John) |
Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Larry R Smith.( Husted, John) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by L. Charles Van Cleef on behalf of Lucky Tunes #3 LLC (Van Cleef, L.) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint personally served on Defendant Larry R. Smith on 11-05-2018, filed by Lucky Tunes #3 LLC. (Baggish, Stuart) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service of Process by Marcus J. Collins, served on Defendant Jason Railsback on 10-31-2018, filed by Lucky Tunes #3 LLC. (Baggish, Stuart) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Jason Railsback, Larry R Smith and emailed to Plaintiff for service. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Jason Railsback)(rlf) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Lucky Tunes #3 LLC (Baggish, Stuart) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Original) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7001468.), filed by Lucky Tunes #3 LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-F to Plaintiff's Original Complaint)(Baggish, Stuart) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2018: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (rlf, ). |
District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III added. (rlf) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Lucky Tunes #3 LLC. (rlf) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rlf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.