Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Roy Allen Johnson |
Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
6:2018cv00610 |
November 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Thad Heartfield |
John D Love |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE Per General Order 19-01, all civil actions pending in the Eastern District of Texas wherein the United States or an agency, corporation, officer or employee of the United States is a party are STAYED. All such cases shall remain stayed until such time as an appropriations bill or a continuing resolution is enacted restoring funding to the Department of Justice or a subsequent Order lifting this stay (in whole or in part) is entered. (ksd) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk shall issue and Plaintiff shall serve summons on the United States Attorney, Tyler, Texas; the United States Attorney General, Washington, D.C.; and the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Dallas, Texas. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 12/18/2018. (mjc, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roy Allen Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Nedbalek, Kami) |
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASES. Case reassigned to District Judge Thad Heartfield for all further proceedings. District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 12/4/2018. (saenz, ) |
Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (rlf) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rlf) |
District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge John D. Love added. (rlf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner, Social Security Administration, filed by Roy Allen Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nedbalek, Kami) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roy Allen Johnson | |
Represented By: | Kami Lynn Nedbalek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.