Miller v. Collier et al
| Robert Miller, . |
| Lorenzo Bustos, Jerry Franklin, Sam Cummings, Brian Collier and William Jones |
| 6:2018cv00650 |
| December 20, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| John D Love |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the above-styled civil rights lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice as to the refiling of another in forma pauperis lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but without prejudice to the refiling of this lawsuit without seeking in forma pauperis status and upon payment of the full $400.00 filing fee. It is further recommended that should the Plaintiff pay the full filing fee within 15 days after the date of entry of dismissal, he be allowed to proceed in this lawsuit as though the full fee had been paid from the outset. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 2/9/2019. (rlf) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Miller. (Attachments: #1 Financial Data Sheet)(gsg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Robert Miller. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law)(gsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
