Data Scape Limited v. PFU (EMEA) Limited et al
| Data Scape Limited |
| Fujitsu Limited and PFU (EMEA) Limited |
| 6:2018cv00659 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (gsg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/14/2019: #1 Corrected Form) (gsg, ). |
|
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Data Scape Limited (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Gregory Carr Noschese on behalf of Fujitsu Limited (Noschese, Gregory) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Elizabeth Carroll on behalf of Fujitsu Limited (Carroll, Claire) |
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Fujitsu Limited (Williams, Steven) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Fujitsu Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Williams, Steven) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Data Scape Limited (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas John Ward, Jr on behalf of Data Scape Limited (Ward, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Abernathy Henry on behalf of Data Scape Limited (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Data Scape Limited. Fujitsu Limited served on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Issued as to Fujitsu Limited, PFU (EMEA) Limited. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) - Fujitsu)(mjc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rlf) |
| District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III added. (rlf) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Data Scape Limited. (rlf) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Philip X Wang on behalf of Data Scape Limited (Wang, Philip) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by C. Jay Chung on behalf of Data Scape Limited (Chung, C.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul Anthony Kroeger on behalf of Data Scape Limited (Kroeger, Paul) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc A Fenster on behalf of Data Scape Limited (Fenster, Marc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brian D Ledahl on behalf of Data Scape Limited (Ledahl, Brian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Data Scape Limited of Related Case (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Data Scape Limited (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fujitsu Limited, PFU (EMEA) Limited ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7077319.), filed by Data Scape Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mirzaie, Reza) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.