Comfort v. Gregg County Jail
Matthew Allen Comfort |
Gregg County Jail |
6:2019cv00175 |
April 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Jeremy D Kernodle |
John D Love |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER that the Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of receipt of this order in which to either pay the statutory $400.00 filing fee, or furnish an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis which should be accompanied by a properly certified in forma pauperis data sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 5/2/2019. (mjc, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER that the Plaintiff has until 6/7/2019 from the date of receipt of thisorder in which to file an amended complaint setting forth a short and plain statement of his claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 5/2/2019. (mjc, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER construing this case as a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983, and directing the clerk to correct the docket to reflect the same. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 5/2/2019. (mjc, ) |
Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (rlf) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT. (rlf) |
Filing 2 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 4/28/2019. (nkl, ) |
Case transferred in from Marshall Division on 04/29/2019; Case Number 2:19-cv-133. (rlf) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. CONSENT FORM MAILED TO PETITIONER. (rlf) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Matthew Allen Comfort. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(nkl, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Comfort v. Gregg County Jail | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Gregg County Jail | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Matthew Allen Comfort | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.