Garrett et al v. United States of America et al
| Dwayne Garrett and Shirley Webster Garrett |
| Bill Bar, Nancy Pelosi, Administrative Office of the United States Court, United States of America, Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Shumaker |
| 6:2019cv00196 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| John D Love |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Dwayne Garrett. (mjc, ) |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Dwayne Garrett on 6/21/2019 as to #8 Judgment, #7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations.(mjc, ) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail, R&R #4 , sent to Dwayne Garrett. Note: Unclaimed. (mjc, ) |
| Mailed Order #7 and Final Judgment #8 to Dwayne Garrett via certified mail rrr, tracking no. 70183090000184390203, and to Shirley Webster Garrett via certified mail rrr, tracking no. 70183090000184390296. (mjc, ) |
| Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT that the parties take nothing and all pending motions are denied as moot. All claims, counterclaims and third-party claims in this suit are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety. Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 6/17/2019. (mjc, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for #4 Report and Recommendations, and dismissing this case with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court orders all other pending motions denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 6/17/2019. (mjc, )
|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Dwayne Garrett, Shirley Webster Garrett. (mjc, ) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Shirley Webster Garrett on 5/28/2019 as to #4 Report and Recommendations. (mjc, ) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 Complaint, filed by Shirley Webster Garrett, Dwayne Garrett. The Court RECOMMENDS that the above captioned action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Furthermore, the Court RECOMMENDS that all other pending motions be DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 5/22/2019. (gsg) |
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (mjc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Consent form mailed to Plaintiffs. (mjc, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Administrative Office of the United States Court, Bill Bar, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Shumaker, United States of America. (mjc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Administrative Office of the United States Court, Bill Bar, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Shumaker, United States of America, filed by Shirley Webster Garrett, Dwayne Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Documents, #2 Exhibit - EDTX Lawsuit)(mjc, ) |
| Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 6-47163. (mjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
