Kennedy v. Director
| Michael Kennedy |
| TDCJ-ID Director |
| 6:2019cv00219 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| John D Love |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE until the Petitioner demonstrates that all sanctions imposed upon him by the Fifth Circuit or any court within the jurisdiction of the Fifth Circuit have been satisfied. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 7/11/2019. (gsg)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for #3 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE until such time as Petitioner Michael Kennedy demonstrates that all of the sanctions have been satisfied. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 7/11/2019. (gsg)
|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Michael Kennedy on 6/4/2019 as to #3 Report and Recommendations. (gsg) |
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Kennedy. Recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice until Petitioner shows proof that all the sanctions which have been imposed against him have been satisfied. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 5/22/2019. (gsg) |
| Case Reassigned to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. District Judge J. Campbell Barker no longer assigned to the case. (rlf) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of financial data sheet by Michael Kennedy re #3 Report and Recommendations, (gsg) |
| Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Love (gsg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope(s))(gsg) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (gsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kennedy v. Director | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: TDCJ-ID Director | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Kennedy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
