Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. et al v. Richardson
Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. |
Ellen Richardson |
6:2019cv00427 |
September 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
J Campbell Barker |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and, COUNTERCLAIM against Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. by Ellen Richardson.(Noteware, Daniel) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #5 motion for extension of time to answer; granting #6 motion to expedite limited discovery; denying as moot #8 motion to shorten deadline. The parties are ordered to file their joint proposed scheduling order on or before December 6, 2019. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 11/8/2019. (ndc) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Change Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) by Ellen Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Ellen Richardson, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Noteware, Daniel) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Expedite Limited Discovery filed by Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc.. (Wilcox, Stephen) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Expedite Limited Discovery filed by Ellen Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Noteware, Daniel) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Discovery to Shorten Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Expedited Limited Discovery by Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilcox, Stephen) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Franco, Philip) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Expedite Limited Discovery by Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Michele Krieg, #2 Exhibit 2 - Richardson Employment Agreement, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Franco, Philip) |
Filing 5 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Ellen Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Noteware, Daniel) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc., Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Ellen Richardson served on 9/24/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. (Franco, Philip) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Philip Anthony Franco on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Franco, Philip) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Ellen Richardson. (mjc, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge J. Campbell Barker. (ksd) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ksd ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief and Damages against Ellen Richardson ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7442374.), filed by Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc., Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Wilcox, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.