Bailey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Damotress Bailey |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| 6:2019cv00473 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| John D Love |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Partial Filing fee paid per court order: $ 25.00, receipt number 6-50196. (mjc, ) |
| INITIAL Partial Filing fee paid per court order: $ 100.00, receipt number 6-49927. Payment was originally docketed in 6:19cv173. (mjc, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER finding as moot #5 Motion to Pay Filing Fee in Installments; granting #6 Motion to Pay Filing Fee in Installments. Plaintiff shall pay an initial deposit of the filing fee of $100.00 by November 1, 2019, with the remainder of the filing fee to be paid in $25 installments due at the first of each month. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 10/30/2019. (gsg)
|
| Filing 6 Amended MOTION Leave To File the Filing Fee in Installments by Damotress Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nedbalek, Kami) |
| Filing 5 MOTION Filing Fee Installment Payments Request by Damotress Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nedbalek, Kami) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 10/21/2019. (ksd )
|
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (ksd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Damotress Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Nedbalek, Kami) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner, Social Security Administration, filed by Damotress Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Nedbalek, Kami) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ksd ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. (ksd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bailey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Damotress Bailey | |
| Represented By: | Kami Lynn Nedbalek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
