Tristani et al v. Optionsellers.com, Inc. et al
| Radford Tarry, Anthony Tristani and Mark Marshall |
| Optionsellers.com, Inc. and James Cordier |
| 6:2019cv00585 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer filed by Mark Marshall, Radford Tarry, Anthony Tristani. (Goff, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/28/2020: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (gsg, ). |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #6 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer. Responses due by 1/27/2020. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 1/17/2020. (gsg)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer by Mark Marshall, Radford Tarry, Anthony Tristani. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Andrew R. Kurland on behalf of James Cordier, Optionsellers.com, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7603062. (Kurland, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jed I. Bergman on behalf of James Cordier, Optionsellers.com, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7603067. (Bergman, Jed) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer by James Cordier, Optionsellers.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Tristani Account Agreement, #2 Exhibit B: Marshall Trust Account Agreement, #3 Exhibit C: Tarry Account Agreement, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Pamphilis, Constantine) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by James Cordier, Optionsellers.com, Inc. (Pamphilis, Constantine) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint #4 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Optionsellers.com, Inc. to 1/3/2020; James Cordier to 1/3/2020. 39 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, ) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re James Cordier, Optionsellers.com, Inc..( Pamphilis, Constantine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT. (mll, ) |
| District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle added. (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against James Cordier, Optionsellers.com, Inc., filed by Anthony Tristani, Mark Marshall, Radford Tarry. (Filed in state court as "Plaintiffs' Original Petition") (mll, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Mark Marshall, Radford Tarry, Anthony Tristani. (mll, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Optionsellers.com, Inc., James Cordier from 369th Judicial District Court of Cherokee County, Texas, case number 2019-110546. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7560667), filed by Optionsellers.com, Inc., James Cordier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pamphilis, Constantine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
