Norris v. Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking
| Billy Norris |
| Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking |
| 6:2019cv00617 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking to 3/6/2020. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( gsg ) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking.( Kolder, Eric) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint #4 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking to 2/19/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, ) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking.( Kolder, Eric) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Billy Norris. Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking served on 12/30/2019, answer due 1/20/2020. (mjc, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking, and emailed to plaintiff for service. (mll, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7586751.), filed by Billy Norris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hommel, William) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Billy Norris. (mll, ) |
| District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (mll, ) |
| MINUTE ORDER adopting in this case Judge Barker's standing orders, which may be obtained from his court-website page. Noncompliance with those standing orders may result in a sanction or other disadvantage. (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Norris v. Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Billy Norris | |
| Represented By: | William S Hommel, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sharon Barrington dba Barrington Trucking | |
| Represented By: | Eric J Kolder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
