Aspen Specialty Insurance Company v. Yin Investments USA, LP
| Aspen Specialty Insurance Company |
| Yin Investments USA, LP |
| 6:2020cv00006 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, within 14 days of this order, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 2/25/2020. (ndc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Added attorney Brook Frances Minx for Aspen Specialty Insurance Company. Attorney Mark Youngjohn terminated. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 02/20/20. (mll, )
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney and Substitute Counsel by Aspen Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Youngjohn, Mark) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Aspen Specialty Insurance Company (Youngjohn, Mark) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT First against Yin Investments USA, LP, filed by Aspen Specialty Insurance Company.(Youngjohn, Mark) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Yin Investments USA, LP, and emailed to plaintiff for service. (mll, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Yin Investments USA, LP ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7596556.), filed by Aspen Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Youngjohn, Mark) |
| District Judge J. Campbell Barker added. (mll, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, ) |
| MINUTE ORDER adopting in this case Judge Barker's standing orders, which may be obtained from his court-website page. Noncompliance with those standing orders may result in a sanction or other disadvantage. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aspen Specialty Insurance Company v. Yin Investments USA, LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Yin Investments USA, LP | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aspen Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Mark Youngjohn |
| Represented By: | Brook Frances Minx |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
